January
2003
JDF Unleashes Five-Pronged Attack On Crime
“Let nobody make the mistake that soldiers standing
anywhere on any of these duties will hesitate under proper circumstances
to use his weapon. Don’t make that mistake. There are no soft soldiers. We
are governed by the rule of law and there is no point in using the level
of force that is not proportional. So if you threaten the life of a
soldier, he will respond”.
Rear Admiral Lewin
|
In a wide-ranging interview with
Sunday Herald’s managing editor, Desmond Richards, head of the Jamaica
Defence Force, Rear Admiral Hardley Lewin, outlines the military’s
strategy in the security forces’ assault on crime.
Rear Admiral Hardley Lewin says the Jamaica Defence Force’s (JDF) role in
the current assault on crime was based on a five pronged strategy. The
military plan, Rear Admiral Lewin said, was riveted on the understanding
that soldiers were out there to support the police.
“There was never any intention that we would ever take over the role of
the police. The police are undergoing a few changes. They have their
corporate plan which has been well-articulated over the past number of
years, but at this point in time, while they work on their corporate
strategy, there is the need for the police to be assisted in certain
critical areas, ” he said.
The 31-year army veteran is conscious of the fact that soldiers are
servants of the people and as such should be ready at all times to assist
the public. After 30 years supporting the police’s crime-fighting
initiatives, the army, Rear Admiral Lewin said, was shifting strategies.
Desmond Richards: Tell us about it.
Rear Admiral Lewin: Basically we are operating to a set of
strategies, we are operating to a game plan. And I can outline the five
strategies and it is important that we know that all the five strategies
hang together.
The first one is to win the hearts and minds of the citizens within the
communities and whereas the emphasis is on inner-city communities to
start, clearly it is the hearts and minds of the entire population of
Jamaica, because it is from them that we get the reports that will help
the police to take action.
Secondly, to provide a security umbrella to isolate or displace the
criminal elements who prey upon these communities. We do this by our
presence.
The third strategy is to assist with the rebuilding of community
organizations, community leadership and social services. I want to stress
here that we assist because neither the police nor the JDF combined have
the resources necessary to carry out all that is required to build those
communities. But, we have made the start because we had to bring something
tangible with the other two strategies that we spoke of.
The fourth one, is to execute focused intelligence-driven operations. This
is the sharp end of the strategy and as far as the JDF is concerned we
wish to and will hand off those communities to the Jamaica Constabulary
Force for normal community policing, once those areas have been deemed in
a state where they can be handed over (fifth strategy). The intention then
is that the JDF will move on to another community.
I should point out that the entire initiative in a sense is islandwide and
by islandwide I mean, whilst we are all focused on certain communities in
the inner-city, wherever the police require our assistance, the JDF will
be there to assist them. So, we cannot just look on what is happening in
Hannah Town, Denham Town, and believe that that is it. It is five sets of
strategies that all come together.
DR: So far, have you reached that level in any of the
communities?
RAL: No, No! We have been focused on Hannah Town, and Denham Town
to a lesser extent, and we don’t expect that there are going to be any
quick results arising from these, because it takes a longer time to build
back those community organizations, to build back the community
leadership.
DR: What are you building? How are you building back
communities? Are you building infrastructure, talking to people, trying to
get a public relations thing going?
RAL: No, we are not into public relations and I really want to make
that clear. As far as public relations is concerned, we treat public
relations as the good that comes from us operating properly and
professionally. We are not looking for glossy pictures and so on. If you
can, fine, but this is not out intention. Our intention is to be
professional, treat the citizens with respect and courtesy, but be firm in
the execution of our duties. The public relations we are looking must come
from that.
DR: What has been done by the security forces to
improve infrastructure?
RAL: Well I would like to confine most of what I have to say to
what we have been doing. The police have a parallel program and there it
varies. Whilst I say that, the police are there with us. Where we are
working, we have taken on a number of derelict buildings, which were not
safe for the people of the communities.
Secondly, it was unsafe for the police and the soldiers operating in those
communities as these buildings could be used to provide cover for criminal
activities. We are addressing certain garbage collection issues. We have
brought down medical teams into the areas and we have had good responses
to all of these. We have also made contact with a number of community
leaders at various levels, people at the schools and so on, people who we
want to emerge as the dominant force within these communities. As we work
to rebuild that leadership, we are anticipating that very soon the larger
social services will come in to bring the necessary resource base to the
project. But, there must be people there with leadership within the
community, so we are merely assisting the process.
DR: Earlier you spoke about operations driven by
intelligence. Are you satisfied with what has been achieved so far?
RAL: I am satisfied with the checks. I never went in there or
embarked on this operation expecting that we have everything we need in
terms of intelligence. It is something we build up painstakingly over
time.
We can’t operate on the basis of rumors. That is the basis for trouble, so
I’m quite satisfied with the way things are going because we’re developing
our intelligence. I never anticipated that we were going to find
immediately huge amounts of arms and ammunition. I can tell you they will
come, maybe not in large concentration, but I assure you that over time
they will come.
After our experiences within the Hannah Town, Denham Town area, you can
call it a pilot project if you wish, we would have learnt. It’s a learning
experience for us. Once we have shown good success it will get easier with
other communities. There are no quick fixes here and it takes a lot of
time to develop the necessary trust.
DR: What are some of the new things that the troops
have learnt since day one?
RAL: I don’t think it’s anything new. It’s really application of
some of the things we knew before. The fact of the matter is, our method
of operation in the past, whilst we may get some gunmen or some guns,
would alienate the communities. The communities turn against us and we are
there to help them. It seems to me that if gunmen actually prey upon these
communities, the people in there are victims. It’s not every person in
there who is shielding gunmen. If gunmen invade and abuse the citizens as
they do, and we roll in to that community and find that the gunmen have
left, and we abuse people because we believe that everybody is a potential
gunman, then we are not going to get any help, and where does that take
us?
It’s more acrimony and yes, there may be one or two bad eggs there, but
the good people won’t tell us because there are fears of recrimination.
So, we have got to take the long slow haul, building up trust in the
communities. People must know that we are there for them, we provide their
security. So, over time it will come together.
DR: Is this what some call soft soldiering?
RAL: I don’t know what you mean by soft soldiering. I don’t know
what is meant by hard policing. I don’t know from where these terms come.
A soldier is trained to obey orders and instructions.
A soldier is a disciplined individual, so when we send a soldier to man
the prisons, or the fire services, and various other areas in time of
need, it is because we have a disciplined body of men and a structure
built on a culture. Let nobody make the mistake that soldiers standing
anywhere on any of these duties will hesitate under the proper
circumstances to use his weapon. Don’t make that mistake. There are no
soft soldiers. We are governed by the rule of law and there is no point in
using the level of force that is not proportional. So if you threaten the
life of a soldier, he will respond.
Sunday Herald 22 – 28 Dec 02
|